Our first trip down the ICW we traveled with the best
cruising mentors anyone could ever have had.
Every evening we’d anchor near each other, and dinghy over to gather in
one or the other cockpit for some rum and some laughs. And every morning at the agreed-on “hooks up”
time, we’d look over and one of them would be at the bow raising their anchor
as Dan and I were raising ours. It was
fascinating to watch because they alternated duties – literally. One day, he’d be at the helm while she
operated the windlass and washed off the anchor chain coming aboard; the next
day it was her turn to helm and his turn to wash. Underway, they’d take 1-hour watches, while
one of them was at the helm steering down the ICW, the other one would be below
“doing their own thing” – reading, baking bread (they were both quite good
cooks), playing on the computer, whatever.
The next hour, they’d switch. If
you hailed them on the VHF you never knew who you were going to get, you had a
50-50 chance, because both took turns. In
a cruising community where the stereotype so often is the reality, the guy is
the sailor and the boat is his and the wife is just along for the ride,
(especially in that age bracket just a little bit older than we are), I can’t
communicate how unusual this absolute interchangeability of skills seemed.
Unlike these friends, Dan and I aren’t alike in our
skills. Each of us can do each one of
the tasks that the boat requires, after a fashion. But that doesn’t mean that we’re both equally
good at, or both interested in, the same things. We both acknowledge that Dan’s the better
sail trimmer, he can eke an extra quarter of a knot out of any configuration,
and he loves to tweak and try. I can
adjust the sails well enough to get us going where we’re going, although it may
not be as fast or comfortable as when he does it, and frankly, I’m not very
motivated – as long as we’re moving smoothly in the right direction, that’s
good enough for me. When it matters,
he’s got the expertise to pick the best way to accomplish the task. Similarly, I’m the better navigator, quicker
to read the charts and geekier with the chartplotter. He can do it, but it
isn’t fun for him, while I love the mathematical elegance. Some tasks we divide along traditional gender
lines; I’ve had the sole responsibility to plan the provisions for our last
long cruise, and he’s always held the unenviable duty of rebuilding the head. Sometimes, we reverse traditional roles. When
we come into a dock I’m generally at the helm, more often perceived as the
position of power and a guy job. But it more
practical for us to switch; either of us can command the 40 horses that move
this boat with a touch of the wheel and a bit of finesse, but should we need to
fend off at the bow, Dan has the greater upper body strength to do it.
There always seems to me more than a hint of a power
imbalance when jobs are divided up along traditional gender lines, with the
husband in charge of the boat and its mechanical items, and generally being the
skipper and commander while the wife is in charge of support duties like
cooking and provisioning. All the tasks
necessary to keep our boat running smoothly and safely and keep the crew
comfortable are just that – necessary – and I rebel against the implication
that some are more important than others.
Yet the traditionally female (“pink”) jobs just uniformly don’t get the
kind of respect that the “blue” jobs do and seem to be viewed as less worthy,
important, desirable. But really, which
is more unpleasant – spending the afternoon shopping for 3 months’ worth of
groceries, or spending the afternoon playing with the inlet valve for the
holding tank?
So in a cruising community that often defaults to sorting
and ranking tasks by gender, what does it take to make a relationship
equal? Back to our good friends and
mentors that I described earlier. They both had their captain’s licenses and
their skills were almost exactly alike – what seemed the foundation of a
perfectly egalitarian cruising relationship, which in fact they had. And yet, having skills that are “alike” is
neither necessary nor sufficient to create a relationship that is “equal.” I think their relationship was equal because
they lived that way on land or afloat; and would have treated each other that
way regardless of whether their skills were identical, or even at comparable
levels or not. I believe Dan and I are equal
in in power terms in our relationship, but our skills are not at all
alike. They are complementary rather
than similar in the way our friends’ are.
What I’m good at, Dan is less good at, and vice-versa; together we cover
the full spectrum of what we need to stay afloat metaphorically and
nautically. “Alike” and “equal” are two
different things.
* This month’s RaftUp topic is “Pink Jobs and Blue Jobs.” I inadvertently jumped the gun on my Raft-UP
blogging colleagues; I wrote about that last autumn when I
learned to work onthe outboard engine. Other RaftUp contributions are linked in the sidebar to the left.
Click on the monkey's fist to read others bloggers on this topic.